Monthly Archives: May 2008

Calling All New Yorkers

I’m going to be traveling to New York City in June. I’ve never been there before, which is the whole reason I’m going there with a couple of friends; we just picked a city where we knew we could have a good time.
Anyway, we’ll only be there for a few days, but I’m looking for suggestions. If you know of any good bars, breweries, billiard joints, bookstores, bowling alleys, burger joints, burlesques, or even places that don’t start with the letter B, I want to hear about them. Our hotel is on the Upper East Side of Manhattan, but for the right adventure, we’ll go most anywhere.

Posted in Uncategorized | 17 Comments

Country Favorites

Over at his blog, John linked to another blog whose author is collecting people’s lists of their top 10 country artists. This is almost an impossible challenge; the fun (for people like me) will really be in making the lists and then talking about them. John’s choices are all great, too, and I can’t argue with his selections. I also think he made a good point with his ground rules about genre considerations, though I think he and I have a slightly different placement for the dividing line between pop and country. (Plus he didn’t want to include Biggie, which is just biased.) Still, the list is supposed to be favorite country artists in the slightly more traditional sense — someone whose name is typically identified with the genre — so that’s the direction I leaned. If anyone’s interested in discussing this difference, I’m geekily all for it.
Anyway, the selection process was tough, but here are my top 10 country artists. The race was so close that the ranking is almost arbitrary:
1. Old 97′s
2. Gram Parsons
3. The Jayhawks
4. Steve Earle
5. Johnny Cash
6. Emmylou Harris
7. Townes Van Zandt
8. Lyle Lovett
9. Willie Nelson
10. Dixie Chicks
To celebrate, here’s Steve Earle doing “Fort Worth Blues”:

Posted in Music | 1 Comment

A Spoiler-Filled Rant About Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull

• Seriously, a horde of helpful monkeys swinging with Shia LaBeouf through the jungle? The fact that Shia LaBeouf swung from vine to fine in the first place?
• Indy survived a nuclear blast by hiding inside a fridge, and was completely fine after that? And why was there a jokey reaction shot to a prairie dog?
• Marion Ravenwood comes back and gets zero time to be a character? I don’t know what’s worse, squandering Karen Allen or ruining the memory of the relationship Marion built with Indy in Raiders of the Lost Ark. They had so much time in that movie to spend together on screen, building chemistry, but in the new film she just shows up and they trade some really awful zingers that don’t at all sound like them, and then they’re back in love.
• I get that Indy doesn’t like snakes, but he’s not terrified of them. At the beginning of Raiders, when his pilot buddy flies him out of danger, he only freaks out for a minute at the snake coiled at his feet before his terror just turns to anger at having the snake there in the first place. Even in the chamber holding the Ark, he puts up with the snakes well enough to set them on fire and rescue Marion. All that to say: Having him act like a baby and refuse to grab hold of a snake that he can use to get out of a sandpit seemed weak, and having him insist that Marion and Mutt refer to the snake as a rope was just lamentable.
• Way too much dependence on CGI. Special effects are tools to tell a story; form cannot drive function. The whole film felt rubbery and unmoving and cold because of the huge emphasis on greater and greater scenes of CGI effects. (And let’s not forget the prairie dogs and monkeys.)
• Aliens? Really? When Irina tells Indy that the skull was not made by human hands, he responds with a skeptical, “Come on.” That’s exactly how I felt. Indiana Jones has always existed in a heightened, pulpy universe as a hero questing after man-made objects imbued with supernatural gifts. (The reason Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade felt so much better than Temple of Doom is because the story returned to the format of Indy fighting the Nazis for control of a Christian historical artifact.) But these religious objects, whether the Ark of the Covenant or the ugly stones from that Indian village, were always tangible, believable things. Having the crystal skulls belong to aliens does away with all that, and what’s worse, it turns the film from an adventure into a (really) bad sci-fi rip-off. The plot was just flat-out ludicrous.

Posted in Film | 7 Comments

The Damning Effects Of The Masculinity Movement

[What can I say, I'm on a religion kick today.]
I read Wild at Heart in college. Everyone did, or at least, a lot of the guys did. I could spend weeks discussing abstract principles and specific examples of how memes tend to crop up and sweep through Southern evangelical circles like fire. It’s the same way fashion and music trends appear seemingly out of nowhere and consume high schoolers or twentysomethings or any given age group, only the church patterns carry more weight because there’s an inherent and unspoken perception that the thing you’re participating in isn’t just new or popular but also Important and Meaningful and Connected to the Fate of Your Immortal Soul. It’s why everyone my age from that background still knows the words to “Flood”; sometimes, these things just happen. In college, what happened was John Eldredge’s Wild at Heart.
It wasn’t just Eldredge’s writing style that put me off, or the fact that the book seemed to have been hastily cobbled together and not edited at all. I like to think I have a healthy respect for accuracy and language, and reading about “Jerry McGuire” didn’t exactly inspire confidence, since if the author couldn’t bother to fact-check his pop culture references, what assurance did I have that he wasn’t on theologically shaky ground as well? But my biggest problem with the book was the manner of the responsibility it seemed to be calling me to, and the fact that years of not inconsiderable education and thought, not to mention a set of loving and God-fearing parents, hadn’t taught me what Eldredge and others in the burgeoning masculinity movement said was my real purpose. Apparently, while I’d been learning and trying to be a good person, I was supposed to be preparing myself for some kind of epic battle for the heart of a woman and possibly the fate of all mankind.
The Christian camps I attended in the summers of my youth had never skimped on the Braveheart parallels, but while they used Mel Gibson’s movie mainly as a terrifying example of sacrifice for a cause, it wasn’t until the masculinity movement kicked off that writers and preachers began to see a whole new side of William Wallace for modern Christian men to mimic. Eldredge wrote that most Christian men believe God wants them to be “nice guys,” and there’s apparently an inherent failure in this that I never really saw. Most of Jesus’ teachings and the epistles of the New Testament did seem to be about being, you know, nice.
But Eldredge is just a misguided man of passion next to Marc Driscoll, who through the Mars Hill Church in Seattle is apparently doing his damnedest to ruin my religion. Driscoll has said that the modern church has turned out “a bunch of nice, soft, tender, chickified church boys.” And just in case you’re wondering if Driscoll is the kind of person who uses words like “dudes” and “chicks” ironically, he isn’t: “Sixty percent of Christians are chicks, and the forty percent that are dudes are still sort of chicks.” Driscoll’s other quotes are equally enlightening: “Jesus was not a long-haired, effeminate-looking dude,” but a man with “big biceps.” Real men are “dudes: heterosexual, win-a-fight, punch-you-in-the-nose dudes.”
There’s also a terrifying group called GodMen, all one word. The most worrisome part of this noxious promotional video is the moment at around 2:40 when one of the men in the crowd at the gathering said that he’s preparing to be a pastor and as such has thought he needed to be more meek and humble, but he’s now had a change of heart. That’s right: This man who had been contemplating entering the ministry and pursuing Jesusian qualities that are actually cited in the Beatitudes has decided not to do that because he’s been misled by a part of the masculinity movement.
There are two main problems with this whole thing, namely, that the movement creates a false definition for masculinity and then says that it must be pursued. But this is such a dangerous, damning road to walk. It’s a divisive tactic born of branding and the desire to sell books, and to mistake the movement’s sectarian call for segregation among believers damages the men at its center and would seem to ignore the God they claim to follow. Yet it’s also easy to see why the movement has such a foothold in the souls of men my age: It promises power and revolution, and talks about swords and being valiant. We are a generation scattered further afield than our parents; we search for answers and yearn for something like guidance, but this isn’t it. This is wrong, and mean, and small-minded, and it plays into an idea of stereotypical maleness that has nothing to do with manhood.

Posted in Religion | 11 Comments

Probably The Most Spiritually Graphic (And Disturbing, And Probably Offensive) Image I Have Ever Created

A few weeks ago, I was hanging out with some old friends from college and discussing our common experiences, including a week-long course in human sexuality that a few of us had taken. Taking a class like that at a school like mine basically meant you were in for four straight days of therapy, since most of us were repressed white kids from middle- to upper-middle-class churches in the South. You’ve met a million of us. One of the things we got to talking about was the quasi-spiritual language employed by some of our classmates in the context of the course as an excuse to sound educated or advanced or just generally better than everyone else. Below, an excerpt of the beer-fueled rant into which I heartily threw myself:
“He said he was ‘convicted’ that masturbation was a sin. Well, I was ‘convicted’ that I was a college student and that it’s a great stress reliever. Plus I never know what anyone means when they say they were ‘convicted’ about it. I get this image of him rubbing one out while holding a Bible, his tears falling down onto the thin pages, crying out, ‘I’m doing it wrong! I’m doing it wrong!’”

Posted in Religion | Leave a comment

“In This Kind Of Love, As Emerson Said, Do You Love Me? Means Do You See The Same Truth?

• I spent a recent weekend embracing revertigo. It’s easy to consider the affliction purely in negative terms, given that it involves becoming the self that you used to be, which is contrary to everything we tell ourselves about growth and maturation and the other labels we give to getting boring. But a friend of mine helped me realize that the term is free of judgment and only becomes positive or negative within a given context. “I feel like I’m the best version of myself around these people,” he said to me, speaking of the friends in our presence, and I knew what he meant.

• We’ve all of us been scarred by the world, but there’s nothing like spending time with people who went to the same private university you did and who received the same level of education and occasionally downright terrible spiritual and career guidance to make you realize how much you have in common, and how it’s something a broader swath of humanity can never understand. We joke about the bad classes, we lament the horrible air of micromanagement that seeped into the administration’s efforts to guide the faith of the student body, and we rail against the occasional instructors who told us that, for whatever reason, we’re not cut out to achieve our dreams.

• I remember being 20 years old and having a ranking professor in the political science department tell me that, because of my faith, I would never make it as a film critic on the New York Times level. I didn’t know if he meant that a good Christian would choose to avoid the varied roster of films that are required viewing for most critics, or if trying to make it in such a mainstream publication would be to abandon my faith; he probably meant all that and more, but I’ll never know. He told me this in the context of an interview I had to endure before I could participate in a film studies program my junior year, and though at 20 I was pretty dumb, I wasn’t stupid enough to contradict the man in that setting. I simply nodded and said I knew he was right and understood his point, but inside I knew that I was done with that place and every fucked up and misguided thing about its mentality. In a weird way, the school often acted as a refining fire, burning off the parts of my faith that mirrored the worst parts of the university and leaving me with something struggling and different and entirely better for me.

• And oh, the conversations you can have with these people, these wounded and wandering people who share so much of your past that every word carries with it the subtext of what it means to grow up in these worlds and to get beyond them. I sat in a bar the other night with four other men my age as we did our best to map out the problems facing the faithful few of our generation and what it means to finally let go of the last shred of the familiar in order to embrace the necessary.

• Because the biggest problem facing my alma mater is the misconception that there’s something special about the school or the place, when it’s the people you can meet there. It’s an understandable problem, but still a stupid one reflective of a mindset that building improvements will make a church better. And you can always tell who from the school gets it and who doesn’t. Every year at homecoming, another senior citizen would address the daily convocation and say that of all the things they liked about our university, the chapel service is what they missed the most. And when I hear that, I always think: You didn’t have any friends here, or anyway, not like mine, not like the ones you could have had.

Posted in Texas | 6 Comments

Review: The Chronicles of Narnia: Prince Caspian

Click here for the review.
On a related note, I completely understand and accept that filmic adaptations of books will never tell the whole story; they can only be as canonical as possible. Still, watching Caspian and Susan flirt was a bit disappointing, as was their kiss at the end, since Caspian doesn’t love Susan but instead winds up marrying the daughter of Ramandu the retired star, whom he meets while journeying through and past the Lone Islands. It’s kind of the whole reason he turns back from the eastern end of the world. But whatever.
On an unrelated note, I have now written more than 150 film reviews for Pajiba, and that’s not even counting Guides or essays on Pajiba Blockbusters or Underappreciated Gems.

Posted in Uncategorized | 3 Comments